[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: drop VDA

Hendrik Leppkes h.leppkes at gmail.com
Sat Sep 30 00:56:45 EEST 2017


On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Clément Bœsch <u at pkh.me> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 08:12:14PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> [...]
>> > Just to be clear (sorry if I make you repeat yourself), we currently have
>> > the following:
>> >
>> > - Systems without VDA (that is, almost all of them) do not have access to
>> >   either VDA or the stub: for them, we are exposing a header with FFmpeg
>> >   symbols not accessible.
>> >
>> > - Systems with VDA have access to the VDA code (assuming it still build)
>> >
>> > What you suggest:
>> >
>> > - Both systems (with and without VDA) should now use the existing stub we
>> >   currently never build so the ABI for systems with VDA will be kept.
>> >
>> > Is that correct?
>> >
>> > If so, this means we will start introducing a deprecated API stub for VDA
>> > on all systems.
>> >
>> > Or should I start exposing the stub only for VDA systems, meaning I'll
>> > need to keep the VDA detection in the configure?
>> >
>>
>> Obivously including the stub everywhere is much easier and far saner,
>> does it really harm to do that?
>>
>
> It's just a bit weird to actually introduce deprecated symbols that
> weren't there in the first place.
>

Since at least BBB was slightly confused by my comments, just to clarfiy:
I don't really care how its done, but the ABI should remain intact. If
I do a simple build on mac today with ./configure && make and it
includes vda symbols, then so it should afterwards, even if they are
non-functional. How thats done, I don't mind.

- Hendrik


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list