[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/5] aptx: implement the aptX HD bluetooth codec

Rostislav Pehlivanov atomnuker at gmail.com
Tue Jan 9 16:07:16 EET 2018


On 9 January 2018 at 09:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:07 AM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > <atomnuker at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Anyway, all this discussion is moot as Hendrik pointed out that profile
> >>> can't be set outside of lavc to determine a decoder behavior.
> >>>
> >>
> >> What, based on a comment in lavc? Comments there describe the api but
> they
> >> rarely define it. We're free to adjust them if need be and in this case,
> >> since the codec profile may not be set, the API user is forced to deal
> with
> >> the lack of such set. Hence, we can clarify that it may be set by lavf
> as
> >> well as lavc as well as not being set at all. And the decoder may use
> it.
> >> I maintain that adding a new codec ID for this is unacceptable.
> >>
> >
> > We already have established methods to select codec sub-variants, we
> > don't need to invent a new one just because you feel like it.
> >
>
> On that note, we also have cases where the same codec has different
> codec ids based on popular known names.
> For example wmv3/vc1 - wmv3 is simple/main profile, vc1 is advanced
> profile, different codec ids, same implementation.
>
> Re-defining public API is what is unacceptable, it requires every
> caller of lavc to suddenly start handling one more field for no real
> reason.
>

Then its a good thing I suggested something that doesn't involve having
every caller of lavc to handle another field.



> Either use a separate codec ID if there is sufficient reason for that
> (mostly driven by external factors, if its handled as different codecs
> everywhere else, not only in marketing but actual (reference)
> implementations), or use a codec_tag if one is available (the codec id
> field from a2dp for example)
>
> - Hendrik
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>

I'd be fine with using codec tags, but not with codec IDs.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list