[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/mjpegdec: fix -Wparentheses warning
Zhao Zhili
quinkblack at foxmail.com
Fri Sep 23 20:46:24 EEST 2022
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Rémi Denis-Courmont
> Sent: 2022年9月23日 22:35
> To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/mjpegdec: fix -Wparentheses warning
>
> Le perjantaina 23. syyskuuta 2022, 20.40.30 EEST Zhao Zhili a écrit :
> > From: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao at tencent.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao at tencent.com>
> > ---
> > libavcodec/mjpegdec.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libavcodec/mjpegdec.c b/libavcodec/mjpegdec.c
> > index c594950500..d77c644d3b 100644
> > --- a/libavcodec/mjpegdec.c
> > +++ b/libavcodec/mjpegdec.c
> > @@ -2866,7 +2866,7 @@ the_end:
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (e = av_dict_get(s->exif_metadata, "Orientation", e,
> > AV_DICT_IGNORE_SUFFIX)) { + if ((e = av_dict_get(s->exif_metadata,
> > "Orientation", e, AV_DICT_IGNORE_SUFFIX))) { char *value = e->value +
> > strspn(e->value, " \n\t\r"), *endptr; int orientation = strtol(value,
> > &endptr, 0);
>
> Isn't it easier to read if you break the assignment out, and use the result as
> predicate??
I prefer the coding style of splitting into two lines personally, but current coding
Style is used everywhere in the code base, so I'm not sure.
Since -Wparentheses has been disabled explicitly, the patch doesn't matter now.
>
> --
> レミ・デニ-クールモン
> http://www.remlab.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list