[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] riscv: vc1dsp: Don't check vlenb before checking the CPU flags
Rémi Denis-Courmont
remi at remlab.net
Fri Dec 15 21:40:30 EET 2023
Le 15 décembre 2023 17:39:48 GMT+02:00, "Martin Storsjö" <martin at martin.st> a écrit :
>On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>
>> Le 15 décembre 2023 15:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Martin Storsjö" <martin at martin.st> a écrit :
>>> We can't call ff_get_rv_vlenb() if we don't have RVV available
>>> at all.
>>>
>>> Due to the SIGILL signal handler in checkasm catching it, in an
>>> unexpected place, this caused checkasm to hang instead of reporting
>>> the issue.
>>> ---
>>> libavcodec/riscv/vc1dsp_init.c | 16 +++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/libavcodec/riscv/vc1dsp_init.c b/libavcodec/riscv/vc1dsp_init.c
>>> index 0d22d28f4d..2bb7e7fe8f 100644
>>> --- a/libavcodec/riscv/vc1dsp_init.c
>>> +++ b/libavcodec/riscv/vc1dsp_init.c
>>> @@ -35,15 +35,13 @@ av_cold void ff_vc1dsp_init_riscv(VC1DSPContext *dsp)
>>> #if HAVE_RVV
>>> int flags = av_get_cpu_flags();
>>>
>>> - if (ff_get_rv_vlenb() >= 16) {
>>> - if (flags & AV_CPU_FLAG_RVV_I64) {
>>> - dsp->vc1_inv_trans_8x8_dc = ff_vc1_inv_trans_8x8_dc_rvv;
>>> - dsp->vc1_inv_trans_8x4_dc = ff_vc1_inv_trans_8x4_dc_rvv;
>>> - }
>>> - if (flags & AV_CPU_FLAG_RVV_I32) {
>>> - dsp->vc1_inv_trans_4x8_dc = ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x8_dc_rvv;
>>> - dsp->vc1_inv_trans_4x4_dc = ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x4_dc_rvv;
>>> - }
>>> + if (flags & AV_CPU_FLAG_RVV_I64 && ff_get_rv_vlenb() >= 16) {
>>> + dsp->vc1_inv_trans_8x8_dc = ff_vc1_inv_trans_8x8_dc_rvv;
>>> + dsp->vc1_inv_trans_8x4_dc = ff_vc1_inv_trans_8x4_dc_rvv;
>>> + }
>>> + if (flags & AV_CPU_FLAG_RVV_I32 && ff_get_rv_vlenb() >= 16) {
>>> + dsp->vc1_inv_trans_4x8_dc = ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x8_dc_rvv;
>>> + dsp->vc1_inv_trans_4x4_dc = ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x4_dc_rvv;
>>
>> I64 implies I32 so it is not necessary to check vlenb twice. That's what I was going for originally in my then review comments but then woopsie.
>
>Sure, fixed.
>
>FWIW I see that vc1_inv_trans_8x4_dc_rvv_i64 seems to fail the checkasm test most of the time as well.
Hmm, I didn't write those optimisations but I thought I tested them before pushing. Is this subtly dependent on the vector length, maybe? Currently only 128-bit hardware is commercially available but QEMU can also emulate 256, 512 and 1014.
>
>// Martin
>_______________________________________________
>ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
>https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
>To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
>ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list