[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Release 6.1
Thilo Borgmann
thilo.borgmann at mail.de
Wed Nov 1 19:53:32 EET 2023
Am 29.10.23 um 20:27 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Kempf:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 19:46, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
>> Am 29.10.23 um 18:56 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Kempf:
>>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 18:20, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
>>>> In this case as well, I think you
>>>> should have transported your reasoning back to this thread on the ML -
>>>
>>> It's actually in this very thread on the ML about the timing and prefering 7.0 over 6.1.
>>>
>>> I even send a longer email to explain.
>>
>> I wonder why you didn't say that one iteration back when I asked you
>> where to
>> find it. (Your answer was "at VDD & on IRC", just not to delete too
>> much history
>> here.)
>>
>> Anyway, in this very thread (and in the Release 6.1 thread started from Michael
>> before this thread of Lynne) I can see exactly 3 prior mails from you.
>
> Mail are not just from me, but about me.
>
> Quoting the mail that supposedly quotes me:
> "6.1 opportunity is gone.
> We're too late on the schedule, and noone had time to work on it, so it is wiser to target 7.0 in January"
>
> I think it's very clear about "opportunity" and "late on the schedule" and what they mean.
>
> You decided then it was not clear and "unsubstantiated", and therefore that my opinion had no value, so I had to expand on it.
I did not.
> So, I spoke about it at VDD, several time, on IRC and it refers to me on this very mailing list.
>
> And instead of asking me to clarify, you started to say that my opinion had no value, and then attacking me.
Asking for clarification is exactly what I did by asking you where to find your
elaborations. You are attacking me here.
-Thilo
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list