[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/10 v4][RFC] AVCodecContext and AVCodecParameters side data
Paul B Mahol
onemda at gmail.com
Mon Sep 25 23:02:31 EEST 2023
On 9/25/23, James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/14/2023 1:40 PM, James Almer wrote:
>> On 9/14/2023 12:43 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>> Quoting James Almer (2023-09-06 19:44:20)
>>>> Changes since the previous version:
>>>> - Removed the AVPacketSideDataSet from AVCodecContext, using instead the
>>>> existing coded_side_data field, at Anton's request.
>>>>
>>>> I still prefer using a new field of type AVPacketSideDataSet, given
>>>> that the
>>>> user can currently only fill coded_side_data manually (See the
>>>> implementation
>>>> in the codecpar copy functions, which non lavf users would need to
>>>> replicate),
>>>> and more so considering coded_side_data is a field pretty much
>>>> nothing but lavf
>>>> uses.
>>>>
>>>> Opinions are very welcome and needed.
>>>
>>> To provide more context on the issue:
>>>
>>> AVPackets can have side data attached to them, in the form of
>>> AVPacket.{side_data,side_data_elems} array+count.
>>>
>>> Some of this side data can occasionally be stored in global headers,
>>> e.g. in containers or extradata. We have some limited support for this:
>>> * AVStream.{side_data,nb_side_data} array+count allows demuxers to
>>> export this to user, and muxers to accept it from the user
>>> * AVCodecContext.{coded_side_data,nb_coded_side_data} allows decoders to
>>> accept it from the user (in principle, in practice it is not used),
>>> and encoders to export it to the user (this is used, but not very
>>> much)
>>>
>>> The broad idea for this set is adding stream-global "coded/packet" side
>>> data to AVCodecParameters, so that it can be naturally communicated from
>>> demuxers to bitstream filters to decoders, and from encoders to
>>> bitstream filters to muxers. Since AVStream already contains an
>>> AVCodecParameters instance, the abovementioned AVStream.side_data
>>> becomes redundant and is deprecated, the muxer/demuxer stream-global
>>> side data would be passed through AVStream.codecpar.
>>>
>>> The original version proposed by James adds a new struct, that bundles
>>> the side data array+count, and a set of helpers operating on this
>>> struct. Then this new struct is added to AVCodecParameters and
>>> AVCodecContext, which replaces the abovementioned AVStream and
>>> AVCodecContext side data array+count. Notably AVPacket is left as-is,
>>> because its side data is widely used and replacing array+count by this
>>> new struct would be a very intrusive break for little gain.
>>
>> In the future, packet side data could be made ref counted. For this,
>> we'd need to add a new AVBufferRef field to AVPacketSideData, which is
>> currently tied to the ABI.
>> Ideally, if this happens, sizeof(AVPacketSideData) would be made not a
>> part of the ABI, putting it in line with the AVFrame counterpart. Doing
>> this is pretty much not an option for the existing array+count fields in
>> AVPacket and AVCodecContext, because everyone, from external API users
>> to our own API users like the CLI last i checked, loop through it
>> manually as nothing prevents them to. But if a new field of the new set
>> struct is added as replacement (a struct where the AVPacketSideData
>> field is an array of pointers, and whose helpers can be defined as "must
>> use to handle this struct"), then this would not be an issue.
>>
>> I probably said it several times, including in the above paragraph, but
>> one of my objectives is trying to sync frame and packet side data
>> structs, fields and helpers, since right now both are considerably
>> different.
>> Jan has a patchset also introducing a side data set for frames, so this
>> is the time to try and align both as much as possible (which i already
>> talked to him about) and laying the ground for future changes.
>>
>>>
>>> My objections to this approach are
>>> * coded side data is now stored differently in AVPacket and in
>>> everything else
>>> * the case for replacing AVCodecContext.coded_side_data does not seem
>>> sufficiently strong to me
>>
>> It's used only by a handful of encoders to export CPB side data, which
>> probably only lavf looks at, and by no decoder at all. It's a field that
>> would be completely painless to replace.
>>
>>>
>>> My alternative suggestion was:
>>> * avoid adding a new struct (which merely bundles array+count)
>>> * add a set of helpers that accept array+count as parameters and operate
>>> on them
>>
>> See above my comment about sizeof(AVPacketSideData) and users accessing
>> the array it directly.
>>
>>> * use these helpers for all operations on side data across AVPacket,
>>> AVCodecContext, and AVCodecParameters
>>>
>>> I have a moderately strong preference for this approach, but James
>>> disagrees. More opinions are very much welcome.
>
> Ping. We really need opinions on what approach to use.
>
> Here's some visual representation of what is being discussed.
> Currently, things look like this:
>
> #########
> Side data definition
> -----
> struct AVPacketSideData {
> uint8_t *data;
> size_t size;
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type;
> };
> -----
>
> Users
> -----
> struct AVCodecContext {
> [...]
> }
>
> struct AVCodecParameters {
> [...]
> }
>
> struct AVPacket {
> [...]
> AVPacketSideData *side_data;
> int side_data_elems;
> [...]
> }
> uint8_t* av_packet_new_side_data(AVPacket *pkt, enum
> AVPacketSideDataType type,
> size_t size);
> int av_packet_add_side_data(AVPacket *pkt,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> uint8_t *data, size_t size);
> uint8_t* av_packet_get_side_data(const AVPacket *pkt,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> size_t *size);
>
> struct AVStream {
> [...]
> AVCodecParameters *codec_par;
> AVPacketSideData *side_data;
> int nb_side_data;
> [...]
> };
> uint8_t* av_stream_new_side_data(AVStream *stream,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> size_t size);
> int av_stream_add_side_data(AVStream *st,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> uint8_t *data, size_t size);
> uint8_t* av_stream_get_side_data(const AVStream *stream,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> size_t *size);
> -----
> #########
>
> The only way for global side data exported by demuxers to hit decoders
> or bsfs is by injecting it into the first output packet. This means it's
> not available at init().
> The solution is obviously being able to store the side data in the
> decoder context, which the caller would copy from the demuxer context.
> My suggestion is to introduce a new struct to hold a set of side data,
> and helpers that work with it, whereas Anton's suggestion is to just
> storing the pointer to side data array and side data array size directly
> without wrapping them.
>
> My suggestion would have things look like this:
>
> #########
> Side data definition
> -----
> struct AVPacketSideData {
> uint8_t *data;
> size_t size;
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type;
> };
>
> struct AVPacketSideDataSet {
> AVPacketSideData **sd;
> int nb_sd;
> };
>
> AVPacketSideData *av_packet_side_data_set_new(AVPacketSideDataSet *set,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> size_t size);
> AVPacketSideData *av_packet_side_data_set_add(AVPacketSideDataSet *set,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> uint8_t *data, size_t size);
> AVPacketSideData *av_packet_side_data_set_get(AVPacketSideDataSet *set,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type);
> void av_packet_side_data_set_remove(AVPacketSideDataSet *set,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type);
> void av_packet_side_data_set_uninit(AVPacketSideDataSet *set);
> -----
>
> Users
> -----
> struct AVCodecContext {
> [...]
> AVPacketSideDataSet *side_data;
> [...]
> }
>
> struct AVCodecParameters {
> [...]
> AVPacketSideDataSet *side_data;
> [...]
> }
>
> AVPacket and its helpers untouched.
>
> struct AVStream {
> [...]
> AVCodecParameters *codec_par;
> [...]
> };
> -----
>
> In which you'd do for example
>
> av_packet_side_data_set_new(avctx->side_data,
> AV_PKT_DATA_DISPLAYMATRIX,
> sizeof(int32_t) * 9);
> av_packet_side_data_set_new(st->codec_par->side_data,
> AV_PKT_DATA_DISPLAYMATRIX,
> sizeof(int32_t) * 9);
> av_packet_side_data_set_get(avctx->side_data,
> AV_PKT_DATA_DISPLAYMATRIX);
> av_packet_side_data_set_get(st->codec_par->side_data,
> AV_PKT_DATA_DISPLAYMATRIX);
> #########
>
> Whereas Anton's would have things look like this:
>
> #########
> Side data definition
> -----
> struct AVPacketSideData {
> uint8_t *data;
> size_t size;
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type;
> };
>
> AVPacketSideData *av_packet_side_data_set_new(
> AVPacketSideData **sd, // INOUT
> size_t *sd_size, // INOUT
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> size_t size);
> AVPacketSideData *av_packet_side_data_set_add(
> AVPacketSideData **sd, // INOUT
> size_t *sd_size, // INOUT
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type,
> uint8_t *data, size_t size);
> AVPacketSideData *av_packet_side_data_set_get(AVPacketSideData *sd,
> size_t sd_size,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type);
> void av_packet_side_data_set_remove(AVPacketSideData *sd,
> size_t *sd_size,
> enum AVPacketSideDataType type);
> void av_packet_side_data_set_uninit(AVPacketSideData *sd);
> -----
>
> Users
> -----
> struct AVCodecContext {
> [...]
> AVPacketSideData *coded_side_data;
> int nb_coded_side_data;
> [...]
> }
>
> struct AVCodecParameters {
> [...]
> AVPacketSideData *side_data;
> int nb_side_data;
> [...]
> }
>
> AVPacket and its helpers untouched.
>
> struct AVStream {
> [...]
> AVCodecParameters *codec_par;
> [...]
> };
> -----
>
> In which you'd do for example
>
> av_packet_side_data_set_new(&avctx->coded_side_data,
> &avctx->nb_coded_side_data,
> AV_PKT_DATA_DISPLAYMATRIX,
> av_packet_side_data_set_new(&st->codec_par->side_data,
> &st->codec_par->nb_side_data,
> AV_PKT_DATA_DISPLAYMATRIX,
> sizeof(int32_t) * 9);
> av_packet_side_data_set_get(avctx->coded_side_data,
> avctx->nb_coded_side_data,
> AV_PKT_DATA_DISPLAYMATRIX);
> av_packet_side_data_set_get(st->codec_par->side_data,
> st->codec_par->nb_side_data,
> AV_PKT_DATA_DISPLAYMATRIX);
> #########
>
> Does anyone have a preference?
Addition of newer API to just reduce number of arguments when
using it looks to me too much for little gain.
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list