[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] lavc/vulkan_av1: port to the new stable API
Lynne
dev at lynne.ee
Sun Feb 11 17:13:01 EET 2024
Feb 11, 2024, 12:58 by sw at jkqxz.net:
> On 10/02/2024 22:39, Lynne wrote:
>
>> 11 files changed, 303 insertions(+), 669 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 libavcodec/vulkan_video_codec_av1std.h
>> delete mode 100644 libavcodec/vulkan_video_codec_av1std_decode.h
>>
>
> You need something in configure to detect whether the AV1 header is available so it can build. (Currently this passes configure and errors out at build time for me with 1.3.275 headers.)
>
This affects multiple files, and it's a bit too much to add an ifdef,
so I've added a version check (1.3.277).
>> - StdVideoAV1MESATile tiles[MAX_TILES];
>> - StdVideoAV1MESATileList tile_list;
>> - const uint32_t *tile_offsets;
>> + uint32_t tile_count;
>> + uint32_t tile_offsets_s[MAX_TILES];
>> + uint32_t tile_sizes[MAX_TILES];
>>
>
> I don't see any check before writing things to this array. What happens if you get a non-conforming stream with more than 256 tiles?
>
Fixed, added a check in vk_av1_decode_slice().
>> +
>> + for (int i = 0; i < AV1_TOTAL_REFS_PER_FRAME; i++) {
>> + vkav1_std_ref->SavedOrderHints[i] = cbs_ctx->order_hints[i];
>>
>
> "SavedOrderHints is interpreted as defined in section 7.20 of the AV1 Specification."
>
> This doesn't look right for frames in the DPB. SavedOrderHints in 7.20 is a two-dimensional array containing OrderHints when that frame was decoded, not the reference order hints of the current frame.
>
SavedOrderHints is a stack that is simply pushed at the time of decoding,
isn't it?
I think this is correct, as these are derived from the bitstream values before
decoding.
>> + vkav1_std_ref->RefFrameSignBias |= cbs_ctx->ref_frame_sign_bias[i] << i;
>> + }
>> +
>> + *vkav1_ref = (VkVideoDecodeAV1DpbSlotInfoKHR) {
>> + .sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_VIDEO_DECODE_AV1_DPB_SLOT_INFO_KHR,
>> + .pStdReferenceInfo = vkav1_std_ref,
>> };
>>
>> for (unsigned i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
>> const int idx = pic->raw_frame_header->ref_frame_idx[i];
>> - vkav1_ref->ref_order_hint[i] = pic->raw_frame_header->ref_order_hint[idx];
>> + vkav1_std_ref->SavedOrderHints[i] = pic->raw_frame_header->ref_order_hint[idx];
>>
>
> Is this overwriting some of the above?
>
Yes, removed.
>> + for (int i = 0; i < STD_VIDEO_AV1_MAX_SEGMENTS; i++) {
>> + for (int j = 0; j < STD_VIDEO_AV1_SEG_LVL_MAX; j++) {
>> + ap->segmentation.FeatureEnabled[i] |= frame_header->feature_enabled[i][j] << j;
>>
>
> "the elements of FeatureEnabled are bitmasks where bit index i of element j corresponds to FeatureEnabled[i][j] as defined in section 6.8.13 of the AV1 Specification"
>
> This looks like you have i and j swapped?
>
The header define it as:
uint8_t FeatureEnabled[STD_VIDEO_AV1_MAX_SEGMENTS];
We define it as:
uint8_t feature_enabled[AV1_MAX_SEGMENTS][AV1_SEG_LVL_MAX];
So FeatureEnabled[i] |= feature_enabled[i][j] << j;
should be correct.
>> + ap->segmentation.FeatureData[i][j] = frame_header->feature_value[i][j];
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ap->loop_filter = (StdVideoAV1LoopFilter) {
>> + .flags = (StdVideoAV1LoopFilterFlags) {
>> + .loop_filter_delta_enabled = frame_header->loop_filter_delta_enabled,
>> + .loop_filter_delta_update = frame_header->loop_filter_delta_update,
>> + },
>> + .loop_filter_sharpness = frame_header->loop_filter_sharpness,
>> + };
>> +
>> + for (int i = 0; i < STD_VIDEO_AV1_MAX_LOOP_FILTER_STRENGTHS; i++)
>> + ap->loop_filter.loop_filter_level[i] = frame_header->loop_filter_level[i];
>> + for (int i = 0; i < STD_VIDEO_AV1_LOOP_FILTER_ADJUSTMENTS; i++)
>> + ap->loop_filter.loop_filter_mode_deltas[i] = frame_header->loop_filter_mode_deltas[i];
>> +
>> + ap->cdef = (StdVideoAV1CDEF) {
>> + .cdef_damping_minus_3 = frame_header->cdef_damping_minus_3,
>> + .cdef_bits = frame_header->cdef_bits,
>> + };
>> +
>> + uses_lr = frame_header->lr_type[0] || frame_header->lr_type[1] || frame_header->lr_type[2],
>> + ap->loop_restoration = (StdVideoAV1LoopRestoration) {
>> + .FrameRestorationType[0] = remap_lr_type[frame_header->lr_type[0]],
>> + .FrameRestorationType[1] = remap_lr_type[frame_header->lr_type[1]],
>> + .FrameRestorationType[2] = remap_lr_type[frame_header->lr_type[2]],
>> + .LoopRestorationSize[0] = 1 + frame_header->lr_unit_shift,
>> + .LoopRestorationSize[1] = 1 + frame_header->lr_unit_shift - frame_header->lr_uv_shift,
>> + .LoopRestorationSize[2] = 1 + frame_header->lr_unit_shift - frame_header->lr_uv_shift,
>>
>
> The standard has:
>
> LoopRestorationSize[ 0 ] = RESTORATION_TILESIZE_MAX >> (2 - lr_unit_shift)
> LoopRestorationSize[ 1 ] = LoopRestorationSize[ 0 ] >> lr_uv_shift
> LoopRestorationSize[ 2 ] = LoopRestorationSize[ 0 ] >> lr_uv_shift
>
> The values here look like log2 of these rather than what they are meant to be?
>
Correct, fixed. Added an AV1_RESTORATION_TILESIZE_MAX constant to av1.h
and calculated them as the spec requires.
>> + };
>> +
>> + ap->film_grain = (StdVideoAV1FilmGrain) {
>> + .flags = (StdVideoAV1FilmGrainFlags) {
>> + .chroma_scaling_from_luma = film_grain->chroma_scaling_from_luma,
>> + .overlap_flag = film_grain->overlap_flag,
>> + .clip_to_restricted_range = film_grain->clip_to_restricted_range,
>> + },
>> + .grain_scaling_minus_8 = film_grain->grain_scaling_minus_8,
>> + .ar_coeff_lag = film_grain->ar_coeff_lag,
>> + .ar_coeff_shift_minus_6 = film_grain->ar_coeff_shift_minus_6,
>> + .grain_scale_shift = film_grain->grain_scale_shift,
>> + .grain_seed = film_grain->grain_seed,
>>
>
> .film_grain_params_ref_idx got lost here.
>
Fixed.
>>
>> if (apply_grain) {
>> for (int i = 0; i < 14; i++) {
>>
>
> The Vulkan headers provide some nice constants for you to use here, use them rather than magic numbers.
>
> (Maybe we should add our own versions of these in av1.h?)
>
Fixed. Did not add our own versions, used the header's.
>>
>> - ap->av1_frame_header.film_grain.ar_coeffs_cb_plus_128[24] = film_grain->ar_coeffs_cb_plus_128[24];
>> - ap->av1_frame_header.film_grain.ar_coeffs_cr_plus_128[24] = film_grain->ar_coeffs_cr_plus_128[24];
>> + ap->film_grain.ar_coeffs_cb_plus_128[24] = film_grain->ar_coeffs_cb_plus_128[24];
>> + ap->film_grain.ar_coeffs_cr_plus_128[24] = film_grain->ar_coeffs_cr_plus_128[24];
>> }
>>
>> /* Workaround for a spec issue. */
>>
>
> Is whatever this is still present?
>
Yes. Removed the comment, added a small TODO at the top.
Sad, all the hardware had the same limitations of requiring a
unique index for each frame, despite supporting image addresses
for the output image.
I think it's fixable with us as the indices should correspond to e.g. LAST_FRAME,
but since we don't have threading on right now, we can fix it later.
>> @@ -480,26 +528,22 @@ static int vk_av1_decode_slice(AVCodecContext *avctx,
>> FFVulkanDecodePicture *vp = &ap->vp;
>>
>> for (int i = s->tg_start; i <= s->tg_end; i++) {
>> - ap->tiles[ap->tile_list.nb_tiles] = (StdVideoAV1MESATile) {
>> - .size = s->tile_group_info[i].tile_size,
>> - .offset = s->tile_group_info[i].tile_offset,
>> - .row = s->tile_group_info[i].tile_row,
>> - .column = s->tile_group_info[i].tile_column,
>> - .tg_start = s->tg_start,
>> - .tg_end = s->tg_end,
>> - };
>> +
>> + ap->tile_offsets_s[ap->tile_count] = s->tile_group_info[i].tile_offset;
>> + ap->tile_sizes[ap->tile_count] = s->tile_group_info[i].tile_size;
>>
>
> I'm confused by why this is indexed by ap->tile_count rather than, say, i - s->tg_start? Isn't this repeatedly overwriting one entry in the array and never touching the others?
>
No, the call to ff_vk_decode_add_slice() modifies ap->tile_count.
It's how it's handled in H26x as well.
The logic is tiles are only added if the function call succeeds.
>>
>> err = ff_vk_decode_add_slice(avctx, vp,
>> data + s->tile_group_info[i].tile_offset,
>> s->tile_group_info[i].tile_size, 0,
>> - &ap->tile_list.nb_tiles,
>> + &ap->tile_count,
>> &ap->tile_offsets);
>> if (err < 0)
>> return err;
>>
>> - ap->tiles[ap->tile_list.nb_tiles - 1].offset = ap->tile_offsets[ap->tile_list.nb_tiles - 1];
>> + ap->tile_offsets_s[ap->tile_count - 1] = ap->tile_offsets[ap->tile_count - 1];
>>
>
> And it's not at all clear what this is doing.
>
Leftover code. Removed, along with tile_offsets_s.
>> av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_VERBOSE, "Decoder capabilities for %s profile \"%s\":\n",
>> @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static int vulkan_decode_get_profile(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVBufferRef *frames_
>> /* TODO: make dedicated_dpb tunable */
>> dec->dedicated_dpb = !(dec_caps->flags & VK_VIDEO_DECODE_CAPABILITY_DPB_AND_OUTPUT_COINCIDE_BIT_KHR);
>> dec->layered_dpb = !(caps->flags & VK_VIDEO_CAPABILITY_SEPARATE_REFERENCE_IMAGES_BIT_KHR);
>> - dec->external_fg = av1_caps.flags & VK_VIDEO_DECODE_AV1_CAPABILITY_EXTERNAL_FILM_GRAIN_MESA;
>> + // dec->external_fg = av1_caps.flags & VK_VIDEO_DECODE_AV1_CAPABILITY_EXTERNAL_FILM_GRAIN_KHR;
>>
>
> What does this mean for the film grain capabilities of the current setup?
>
No film grain on Intel.
Drivers will likely error out on profiles with filmGrainSupport = VK_TRUE,
so avctx->export_side_data must have AV_CODEC_EXPORT_DATA_FILM_GRAIN
for filmGrainSupport to be VK_FALSE, and the application will have to support
applying film grain by itself to be compliant.
We'll have to copy libplacebo's film grain generation eventually,
but I think erroring out is fine for now.
We could force side data to be exported in case the hardware doesn't
support it in a later patch.
>> +int ff_vk_av1_level_to_av(StdVideoAV1Level level)
>> +{
>> + switch (level) {
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_2_0: return 20;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_2_1: return 21;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_2_2: return 22;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_2_3: return 23;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_3_0: return 30;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_3_1: return 31;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_3_2: return 32;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_3_3: return 33;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_4_0: return 40;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_4_1: return 41;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_4_2: return 42;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_4_3: return 43;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_5_0: return 50;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_5_1: return 51;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_5_2: return 52;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_5_3: return 53;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_6_0: return 60;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_6_1: return 61;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_6_2: return 62;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_6_3: return 63;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_7_0: return 70;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_7_1: return 71;
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_7_2: return 72;
>> + default:
>> + case STD_VIDEO_AV1_LEVEL_7_3: return 73;
>> + }
>> +}
>>
>
> Er, what? Where have the numbers on the RHS of this come from? The vulkan header shows the numbers on the left as correctly matching the spec.
>
It's how lavc represents levels for H26x codecs, so
I thought it's the same for AV1. But checking that now, it isn't the case,
so removed it.
Thanks for the review, this caught a lot of issues.
Will send v4 to the ML shortly.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list