[FFmpeg-soc] [soc]: r209 - matroska/matroskaenc.c
michaelni at gmx.at
Sun Jun 3 09:42:28 CEST 2007
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:39:34PM -0400, David Conrad wrote:
> > [...]
> >> +// XXX: should we do any special checking for valid strings for
> >> these 2 functions?
> > i would say no, or put the checks in generic lavf code, duplicating
> > string
> > validity checks in every muxer is silly ...
> Looking at the Matroska spec again, I only see only one string
> written as ASCII being user-specifiable in lavf right now, the ISO
> 639-2 language code. The other user-specifiable strings would be
> written as UTF-8. I don't think the language code is being checked
> anywhere, but if it were, it probably should be against the official
> table of codes. If I were to write string validity checks for user-
> specified strings, where should they go in lavf?
av_write_header() / a function called by av_write_header() would be
the most obvious place
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in
ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners. -- Vladimir Lenin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the FFmpeg-soc