[FFmpeg-soc] work in progress git commits vs. patches to be reviewed

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Wed Jun 11 07:48:57 CEST 2008


With people using git and posting patches here iam a little bit
confused about what is just "work in progress" that is the equivalent to
soc-svn commits and what are supposed to be patches to be reviewed.

Clearly saying "work in progress" or "for inclusion in main ffmpeg, please
review" or "help iam stuck, please review and help me"

would be helpfull to me to know what i should do with each of these patch sets


-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

I hate to see young programmers poisoned by the kind of thinking
Ulrich Drepper puts forward since it is simply too narrow -- Roman Shaposhnik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-soc/attachments/20080611/de3f5630/attachment.pgp>


More information about the FFmpeg-soc mailing list