[FFmpeg-user] Converting images to video using ffmpeg. Is external morphing needed?

[Peter Tap]

Carl,

Thank you for your help.

My knowledge of morphing is very limited. I would appreciate your help in clearing a confusion that I have.I intend to process images that were digitized from a movie film. There are about 24 images in a second. As there is just a little change from one image to another, I am thinking these images must be as good as morphed images. Do you think morphing would still be required?

Regards,
Peter



----- Original Message -----
From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at>
To: ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Converting images to video using ffmpeg. Is external morphing needed?

Peter Tap <ptrtap <at> yahoo.com> writes:

> I have to process some static images into an mp4 video. An 
> article on the internet mentions that, before running 
> ffmpeg/avconv, it is better to run "convert" utility from 
> ImageMagick and create morphed images.

FFmpeg has no morphing filter (yet), patch welcome.

Carl Eugen

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user