[FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

Chris c319chris at aol.com
Sun Sep 2 20:36:53 EEST 2018

I need to convert a 1080p clip to 1080i at 29.97 frames per second (59.94 fields per second). How do I do this?

If I omit the following code I get progressive:

-flags +ilme+ildct

even though I have included 

-vf  "fieldorder=tff","tinterlace=0"

This assumes MediaInfo is reporting "interlace" and "interleave" correctly.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerome Martinez <jerome at mediaarea.net>
To: ffmpeg-user <ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org>
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2018 3:24 am
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Interlace vs. Interleaved Fields

On 9/1/2018 11:12 PM, Chris wrote:> What is the difference, if any, between "Interleaved Fields" and "Interlace" as far as MediaInfo is concerned?Interlaced content can be coded in different manners:- Interleaved fields : line 0, 1, 2, 3 ... 476, 477, 478, 479 (in 1 block), similar to how progressive content is coded- Separated fields: line 0, 2 ... 476, 478, 1, 3 ... 477, 479 (2 fields in 1 block or each field in its own block)graphical display of the difference at e.g. http://www.mir.com/DMG/interl.html_______________________________________________ffmpeg-user mailing listffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.orghttp://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-userTo unsubscribe, visit link above, or emailffmpeg-user-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list