[Libav-user] Licensing question
Ioan.Stan at accesa.eu
Wed Dec 11 17:08:56 CET 2013
I meant FFmpeg library (not application) in both questions.
Also I updated question 1. Hope is more clear now.
1. Let’s suppose that I own a library named "a.dll" that is linked statically or dynamically with FFmpeg library. Another library owned by me and named "b.dll" is linked dynamically with "a.dll". A plug-in based application owned by me and named "App.exe" uses "b.dll" as a plug-in (loads the plug-in at runtime).
In this scenario does "a.dll", "b.dll" or "App.exe" become under LGPLv2.1 or later ? Does the source code corresponding to "a.dll", "b.dll" and "App.exe" become under LGPLv2.1 or later ?
In case the answer is yes, which of these libraries/executable becomes under LGPLv2.1 or later ? Which part of the source code owned by me and used to compile above libraries become under LGPLv2.1 or later?
Ioan Stan senior software developer
T : [ro] +40 3645 607 20; [de] +49 89 2154 892 20
E : Ioan.Stan at accesa.eu
München | Cluj Napoca | Oradea | www.accesa.eu
From: libav-user-bounces at ffmpeg.org [mailto:libav-user-bounces at ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of Carl Eugen Hoyos
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 5:47 PM
To: libav-user at ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [Libav-user] Licensing question
Ioan Stan <Ioan.Stan at ...> writes:
> Also, if we want to provide, together with our application, a
> not-modified copy of FFmpeg, took from your FFmpeg’s web page or
> compiled and linked by us, can our work still be considered a “work
> that uses the library” ?
Do you mean FFmpeg or ffmpeg?
If you mean ffmpeg (the application) and if your application is not linked to libavcodec etc. but if your application simply calls ("exec") ffmpeg, then none of the usual obligations are relevant for your application.
Don't forget that if you distribute ffmpeg (the application) you are responsible for providing the exact source code you used to compile the executable (we do not offer executables, you therefore cannot download them from FFmpeg's web page) and you have to make sure that your users know that ffmpeg was installed and under which license it was installed. (Please don't claim that you "own" FFmpeg, we read this in practically every EULA.)
Concerning "not-modified" (just to make 100% sure): You have the right to modify FFmpeg, it makes no difference if you modify it or not. (I am just adding this because some people seem to believe that it does make a difference and your question could imply that you also think so.)
Concerning your first question: I suspect it also contains a typo, at least I cannot parse it, please try to ask again with a little more information.
Libav-user mailing list
Libav-user at ffmpeg.org
More information about the Libav-user