[Libav-user] License Model LGPL and static linking
Carl Eugen Hoyos
cehoyos at ag.or.at
Fri Apr 22 14:03:14 CEST 2016
Pokriefke, Sven <S.Pokriefke at ...> writes:
> In our software department we would like to use your very good
> and fine working library ffmpeg, which can be licensed under
> Regarding the aspect that we are developing security products,
> we would like to link your library statically instead of
> dynamical, which is demanded by LGPL license.
The LGPL does not demand that you use dynamic linking.
(There are operating systems that do not support
dynamic linking, the license would be braindead if
it would forbid distributing the library for such OSs.)
> the customer shall not have the chance to make the product
> unstable by exchanging the library with a different version.
Then you are not allowed to distribute binaries based on
FFmpeg (unless you open source your whole product): This is
exactly what the LGPL demands.
> Is there any chance to do so? Maybe you also have other
> ideas, which you could share with us.
The argument that you want to save your users from damage by
not allowing them to improve your software seems as if using
open source software in your company is generally a very bad
> This e-mail is confidential and may also be legally privileged.
Please remove this footer from mails sent to a public
More information about the Libav-user